If not, it can never be a true comparison of the qualities of the 'mix engine'. I think that they are all excellent DAWs, and Logic is wonderful to write in, but ProTools does seem to have something in the mix engine that is not in the othersĭo you have the exact same plugins instantiated on every track, aux busses, mix buss etc etc in all three daws? Or no plugins at all? Have you exported audio from one to the other and set up a static mix with all levels and pan positions the same? We've had a rough ride since PT11 came out, let's hope stability will start settling down now.īut that is no excuse to stand still, Pro Tools has a lot of catching up to do on its MIDI functionality. Please let's not reach stability, and then break that in the name of progress. If we are really arriving at a period of stability having got past the 12.2.0 hiccup, then let's hope Avid can maintain that while gradually enhancing MIDI features over time. For simple MIDI stuff Pro Tools will suffice though.Ĭome mix time, I much prefer Pro Tools gui and workflow. Version 12, for me, is very stable.Ĭubase for MIDI work is light years ahead of Pro Tools. PT users think they have everything in MIDI, but that is wrong. You have to know what Cubase to understand that. MIDI side, PT has real value and works very well for many things, but lacks 100 useful functions. I also want to move a series of markers combined! I would like to visually see the full path of an audio stream from the input to the output, through all groups, FX, AUX, with indicating the inserts. For example, the routing scheme should have an overall window. Many interesting features among other DAW must be integrated. However, I hope that Avid will do development. I know there's a lot of momentum to Steinberg products, but for the record, I do not carry. Except for some complex MIDI manipulation, which Cubase is master (where Samplitude is zero, and Pro Tools is average, mostly because it does not have all its functions well presented and that it does not maps like Cubase), I back Pro Tools. Sweetness and voice clarity, proximity, balance, gentle piano, everything. I was also certain that Cubase was going to be at least in Pro Tools. Pro Tools, which I had distanced myself, is winner. Samplitude, despite its complications and its outdated interface, did well. I defended Cubase, but it's over for audio. There is a sail, a blockage on audio, choking. The three DAW with the same settings, including the panoramic width.Ĭubase, which I love for MIDI, but I thought best for audio recording, disappointed me. Setup: Voice (a Neumann TLM49 on an SSM-10 Martinsound, mono), 2 AKG 414 XL II is in stereo preamplifiers SSL) and piano (Vienna Imperial VSL). The reasoning seems good, but the facts contradict it. "Pro Tools 12", "Cubase Pro 8" and "Samplitude Pro X2." I know some people think that the difference is impossible, but they let their ears to the locker room. I do not know if they are interested, but I did a day of testing with three DAW.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |